Showing posts with label safety. Show all posts
Showing posts with label safety. Show all posts

Monday, December 5, 2016

Make America Healthy Again: Congress Must Also Pass a 21st Century Medical Device Safety Act


The MetroWest Daily News, Framingham, MA



By 



As women fighting life-changing autoimmune disease, allergies and more - one life threatening, two with illnesses and injuries caused by different FDA-approved medical and dental devices, and one a former FDA employee fighting chronic autoimmune disease of not yet known cause – we call for Congress to do more than pass a 21st Century Cures Act. Congress must also pass a 21st Century Medical Device Safety Act.

The House of Representatives passed the 21st Century Cures Act 392-26. It is on to the Senate for a vote. Its bipartisan leaders smartly loaded it up with some benefits for almost everyone – a total of $4.8 billion in research funding for the Brain Initiative, Precision Medicine Initiative, Cancer Moonshot, and provisions for mental health, opioid abuse, Lyme disease, and more. Representatives from Pharma, Biotech, and Chronic Disease Groups have stormed the halls of Congress to ensure this bipartisan bill is enacted. On the surface, it is a slam dunk. But look beneath the surface, and we have work to do.

Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass. made a strong speech to stop the bill and fix it, launching a MoveOn petition, “Tell Congress: Don't let Big Pharma hijack the 21st Century Cures Act,” which has gathered over 166,000 signatures in days. Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt, called to rewrite the bill to lower prescription drug costs. A courageous band led by Rep. Mike Fitzpatrick, R-Pa., and Rep. Louise Slaughter, D-NY, have been pressing to address medical device safety, through calls for the passage of Ariel Grace’s Law, the Medical Device Guardians Act, and a reboot of FDA’s device regulations to ensure patient safety first.
Why are we concerned? The Hippocratic Oath - First, do no harm - should apply to all health agencies. The rules governing medical devices at the FDA are focused on cost-benefit. Receiving half of its funding from industry user fees, the FDA’s Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH) has a track record of weighing industry benefits more heavily than patient risks.
FDA’s CDRH uses a dated, mid-20th Century framework to assess device safety. If a new device is tested in a relatively small number of people, with some benefits and without major side effects for a relatively short period of time - as measured and reported by research sponsored by the company - it can be approved as a Class III device. Moreover, the device receives pre-market approval – a get-out-of-liability-free card – so patients have no recourse if harmed.
If a device is “substantially equivalent” to an already approved device, or was “grandfathered,” it can get the go-ahead as a Class II device following a less extensive review process. Facing extraordinary industry pressure for approval, even 19th century devices like mercury-containing dental amalgam are given the benefit of the doubt. There are no patient labels, warnings, or written informed consent for patients or parents, overriding the concerns raised by FDA’s expert Dental Products Panels in 2006 and 2010. Patients also lack recourse. With no medical necessity in dental insurance, insurers deny appeals to replace with biocompatible materials.
Fast forward to today. We know that people vary greatly by gene type, allergies, autoimmune responses, and other metabolic pathways. We know that infants, children, teens, adults and older adults vary greatly over the lifespan. We know that not everyone can eat peanut butter, or wear latex gloves, or get the same blood type transfusion. But we consider a medical or dental device that is safe for the majority, as safe for all. There is no prescreening to determine tolerance vs. toxicity, yet FDA recommends a patch test before using hair color!
What is the scale of harm that results from an outdated framework for FDA device approvals? According to the FDA, for Class III devices:
DeviceDeathsInjuries
Defibrillators16,206164,936
Pacemakers11,869160,936
Infusion pumps2,56192,253
Nerve stimulators2,883122,701
Coronary stents9,60053,293
Breast implants9218,340
Essure3612,763
Penile implants710,201
In Class II, 127,000 injuries and illnesses have been reported for various forms of Mesh, both a Class II and Class III medical device. Over 100,000 patients have called patient support groups for information and referral to biologic dentists and physicians to overcome mercury toxicity and illnesses resulting from Class II dental amalgam, as people with certain gene types do not clear mercury well, and it builds up over time. A risk assessment shows 65+ million Americans are at risk. Together, FDA’s MAUDE and old DENS system have 1,230 reports - remarkable given the website and forms do not mention or give examples of dental products being covered. Fortunately, there is a new MedWatcher mobile application patients can use to report harm. Download the app at www.Medwatcher.org, register, click Device tab, and click Device name.
Congress - and the new Trump Administration - your job is not done. The Senate should press for inclusion of Ariel Grace's Law, the Medical Device Guardians Act, for immediate release of the FDA’s draft 2012 Patient Safety Communication on Dental Amalgam, and investigate the history of problems in the dental and gynecological device units.
Begin working on a comprehensive 21st Century Medical Device Safety Act. Make patient health and safety top priority. Reboot FDA’s Device Center. Ensure medical and dental devices are "right for us" before installation. Prevent medical harm, heartache, chronic diseases, disability, and rising health care costs from FDA-approved devices. Make America Healthy Again.
Laura Henze Russell is the Principal of Precision Research and Communications: Precision Health. Melanie Goshgarian is a Patient Navigator and member of Essure Problems and USA Patient Network. Madris Tomes is a former FDA employee, concerned citizen, and founder of Device Events. To join the effort to Make America Healthy Again and prevent medical device harm, please contact us at laurarussell2@comcast.net, melaniegosh27@gmail.com, and madris@deviceevents.com.

Friday, August 14, 2015

FDA Safety Communication: Reducing Exposure to Mercury Vapor Released From Dental Amalgam (Draft Jan 2012)


FDA Amalgam Safety Proposal


In January 2012, the FDA prepared a “Safety Communication” that recommended reducing the use of mercury amalgam in the general population, and avoiding it in susceptible subpopulations:
  • pregnant and nursing women
  • children under six years of age
  • people with allergy to mercury or other components
  • people with neurological disease
  • people with renal disease
It also recognized the risk of occupational exposure for dental personnel.
The recommendations were never made public, and in January 2015, the FDA issued another statement saying that amalgam was unequivocally safe for everyone. Somehow, somewhere in the reaches of government and the Health and Human Services Administration, this amendment to the FDA rule was killed.

Here is the full text of the original, 2012 proposed rule:

FDA Safety Communication: Reducing Exposure to Mercury Vapor Released From Dental Amalgam (“Silver Fillings”)

HHS has not allowed FDA to release this safety warning. The most vulnerable continue to be harmed by a hidden river of mercury poisoning installed without our knowledge or consent.

Please sign the Petition for Medical and Dental Device Safety Urgent Reform (MEDDSURGE).

Thursday, July 30, 2015

MEDDSURGE: Is Your Medical/Dental Device "Right for You?"

Medical and Dental Device Safety Urgent Regulatory Reform
MEDDSURGE: Top Priority for FDA Reform
Is Your Medical/Dental Device “Right for You”? Keep Pace with Science, Reduce Harm, Lower Costs
 For All Medical and Dental Devices, Congress should require:
·         Written information for patients on what materials devices contain, like for Rx & OTC.
·         One-time pretest to determine which devices are “right for you” in advance.
·         Immediate full implementation of the new system of Universal Device Indicators (UDIs).
·         Redirect device tax to Medical & Dental Device Illness Compensation (MEDDIC) Fund, and end federal preemption so ill and injured patients can seek redress in the courts.

Additionally for Dental Materials:
·         Written informed consent for dental fillings.
·         Medical records to include dental devices, fillings and materials information to allow physicians, epidemiologists and Big Data to assess the potential for health impacts.
·         FDA MedWatch Form 3500B to include a section tailored for dental fillings and devices.
·         Order HHS to release FDA January 2012 Safety Communication on Dental Amalgam.

Thousands of Patients Are Harmed by Medical and Dental Devices:
·         According to MedWatch & DENS, over 1,000 complaints have been filed on dental amalgam. Over 100,000 people have sought volunteer counseling from DAMS to find dentists qualified and able to work with patients ill from dental mercury toxicity.
·         FDA’s MAUDE shows thousands of women have filed complaints for medical devices such as Essure contraceptive coils, vaginal mesh, morcellators, and breast implants.
·         FDA’s MAUDE shows thousands of men and women have filed complaints for cardiac devices, implants, joints, stents, etc. If they are “right for you” is learned after the fact.


We Need Precision Medical and Dental Devices
MEDDSURGE Can Improve Health, Reduce Diseases and Lower Healthcare Costs By:

·         People react differently to foods, prescription drugs, and medical devices and materials.
·         Medical and dental devices provide 24/7/365 exposure to sources of inflammation.
·         Inflammation is at the root of many chronic diseases, from autoimmune to neurological.
·         Ensuring devices are ‘right for us’ will lower chronic disease rates and health care costs.
·         Tailoring medical devices selected for treatment to the characteristics of patients.
·         Conducting clinical trials run as “basket studies” by major genetic variants to determine which device materials are safer for which patients, and which should not be used.
·         Making sure any device used is “right for you” before it is installed.
·         Enabling patients to be reimbursed for uncovered medical, dental and supportive treatments by a Medical & Dental Device Illness Compensation (MEDDIC) Fund, and for patients to recover lost income and care expenses when needed.

Sign MEDDSURGE Petition here.

Monday, July 27, 2015

Breaking News: Four Stories on HHS Cover-Up of FDA Safety Warning on Dental Amalgam

Health officials kill proposal to curb mercury dental fillings
Greg Gordon, McClatchy DC, July 21, 2015

Proposed warnings have been kept secret more than three years
Safety communication could have affected millions of patients
Scientist says one in 10 with mercury fillings could be very ill

Six lives upended by mercury-filled teeth
Greg Gordon, McClatchy DC, July 21, 2015

Dental patients describe battles with mercury
Combing the Internet to find a cause
‘The brain fog in my head lifted’

Things to know about mercury fillings
Greg Gordon, McClatchy DC, July 21, 2015

A risk assessment said 122 million Americans exposed to unsafe mercury levels
Scientist says he can trace sources of mercury in hair, blood and urine
Worried about your mercury fillings? Don’t detox until they’re gone

Mercury-free dentists shoot back at national association
Greg Gordon, McClatchy DC, July 21, 2015


Thursday, May 28, 2015

Silent Spring 2015 - FDA: Lifesaver, or See/Hear/Speak No Evil. Q: Is Your Device "Right for You?"











Silent Spring 2015 - FDA Must Recognize Dental Amalgam Dangers
MetroWest Daily News 
By Laura Henze Russell, Guest Columnist Posted May. 28, 2015 at 8:39 PM 


  • Will FDA throw medical device illness patients a lifesaver, or continue to see, hear and speak no evil of dental and medical devices that - due to genetic variability in methylation, immunity, and detoxification pathways - are not "Right for Us?"
    We need Right To Know and Written Informed Consent for everything installed in our bodies. We need new Universal Device Indicators (UDIs), now being rolled out by FDA, in our electronic medical records - not just in dental records, which are not seen by our doctors, or by BigData, and considered as a factor in disease and health.
    It is time to recognize and respect Genetic Rights, and put patients' health first through Precision Devices. We do not control our DNA, so we need strict controls and prior biocompatibility screening for all dental and medical device materials before they are installed. This is basic science and safety to protect children and adults as genetically unique snowflakes.
    It is impressive that Makers and the Makers movement can make anything these days. That brings great promise, especially as we do not take care to preserve our bodies by being careful about what we eat and what we install in them. The FDA needs to come down squarely on the side of patients and the Maker - who makes our bodies and brains as living, pulsing cells, neurons, organs and systems - that do not take kindly to foreign materials, especially if they have common genetic methylation variants.
    FDA tells us to do a patch test for hair color products 24 hours in advance. It is time to require a one-time advance biocompatibility test for all installed dental and medical materials, before they are permanently installed, with an exception for emergency procedures, in which case post-testing can be done.
    Rachel Carson was a marine biologist who helped protect birds from extinction by noting the impact of DDT on their ability to reproduce. Today, humans are the endangered species, and the endangering one. Mercury is human DDT, wreaking havoc on cells, health and lives. It is time to get it out of U.S. dentistry for all time.
    We must make Precision Devices the top priority for President Obama, the FDA, CDC, NIH, PHS, IHS, HHS and the Surgeon General of the United States, so we stop chronic toxic poisoning of those for whom dental and medical devices are not a good fit, based on their genetic profile. This will significantly lower rates of autoimmune, behavioral, cardiovascular, cognitive, dermatological, kidney, neurological, and psychiatric diseases, as well as memory, mobility, movement, mood and mental status changes, as these are triggered or exacerbated by systemic chronic inflammation.
    The administration, Congress and the courts must take swift action now to reboot the FDA's practically medieval medical device regulations. The bill to regulate devices was proposed by President John F. Kennedy in 1962. It passed 14 years later, in 1976. There is now action to add UDIs to devices under recent legislation that is being rolled out for comment starting this month. However, patients still get no information sheets on composition and health risks, no right of written informed consent for installation of dental fillings or information on who to contact if problems arise as MedWatch Form 3500B Adverse Event Reports make no mention of dental devices, patients do not know the manufacturer or model and serial number as it was never provided, and hundreds of reports filed over the years have been lost or misplaced by the FDA and never entered into MAUDE.
    The FDA repeatedly overrules its own expert product panels on dental amalgam, repeatedly ignores petitions for reconsideration of its flawed risk assessment, repeatedly ignores expert dentist and ill and injured patient testimony. The FDA repeatedly ignores new scientific evidence of immediate neurobehavioral harm and kidney changes to children with certain gene types, and mounting evidence of harm to dentists, dental workers, and patients compared to matched controls, with harm linked to certain gene types that do not methylate well.
    The FDA is repeatedly sued and ordered to act by a federal judge, but still allows dental amalgam to be in Class II unrestricted use with no warnings to patients and no written informed consent. It still allows dental amalgam to be called silver fillings, even though they are 50 percent mercury fillings. It is still studying the safety of dental amalgam, six years after its flawed classification. Labels and warnings to dentists only protect the manufacturers from liability, they do not help patients. Dentists are silent because of gag orders on the health risks of amalgam in the ADA Code of Ethics.
    The ADA is a patent-holding organization that mixes professional and commercial/trade functions. Nobody knows, acts or cares about this fundamental conflict of interest. Except the legions of prematurely aged, cognitively challenged, unsteady on their feet, chronically diseased, disabled, hearts failing, kidneys failing, unemployed and suffering mercury poisoned patients and their families.
    The same thing happens in other devices. Some 4,500 reports have been filed and five women have died from complications from the Essure contraceptive coil. Many women have been harmed by vaginal mesh. Men and women alike have been harmed by various implants in the teeth, jaw, and throughout the body. While modern engineering marvels and the Makers Movement can make anything these days, we must first pay attention to the original Maker - how our bodies as cells and electrical charges operate, and what they can tolerate that is foreign to the human body, which varies as each individual is as genetically unique as a snowflake.
    Laura Henze Russell is the Principal of Precision Research and Communications: Precision Health. She planned to attend the FDA Science Forum May 27-28 in Washington, DC, but is home recovering from pneumonia. Participating through the Webcast, on Day 1 four of her 14 questions have been posed to panelists. You can see them in the Tweet stream here: https://twitter.com/hashtag/FDAScienceForum
    © Copyright 2006-2015 Gatehouse Media, Inc.

ATLANTA WSB-TV2 INVESTIGATES: Are Fillings in Your Mouth Toxic?

Here is a jaw dropper from Atlanta WSB-TV2 on May 18, 2015

Atlanta WSB-TV2 Investigates: Are Fillings in Your Mouth Toxic?
">WATCH THIS SHORT VIDEO NOW


Atlanta WSB-TV2 Investigates: Are Fillings in Your Mouth Toxic?



Tuesday, April 15, 2014

Audio: Rob Moir's Environmental Dialogues with Laura Henze Russell

Audio: Moir's Environmental Dialogues

Listen to Dr. Rob Moir and Laura Henze Russell discuss mercury poisoning and safer alternatives in dentistry.

March 20,2014 Episode  - Dental Assistant Karen Palmer of Bethlehem, PA talks about her occupational mercury poisoning.

March 6, 2014 Episode - Laura Henze Russell talks about the Campaign for Good Health, Call for a Surgeon General's Report, and IAOMT Lawsuit Against the FDA and HHS.

November 29, 2012 Episode - Laura Henze Russell talks about the upcoming Sharon, MA Town Warrant Articles.

Monday, April 14, 2014

Hidden River Health Challenge on YouTube - Watch Us!

Hidden River Health Challenge on YouTube - Watch Us!


March 2014 Resolution for Surgeon General Report to Sharon Finance Committee for May Town Meeting, and IAOMT Lawsuit vs. FDA in a Nutshell (14 min)


December 2012 Articles at Sharon Town Meeting to Learn About, Share and Act on Health Risks of Mercury Dental Amalgam for Genetically Susceptible Children and Adults (14 min)

November 2012 Cable TV Show FYI with Colleen Tuck

October 2012 Presentation to Board of Selectmen on Articles for Town Meeting Dec 2012

Oct. 2012 Presentation to Sharon Finance Committee on Articles for Town Meeting Dec. 2012


July 2012 Presentation to Sharon Board of Health on Health Risks for Dental Mercury Amalgam for Genetically Susceptible Children and Adults