Showing posts with label conflict of interest. Show all posts
Showing posts with label conflict of interest. Show all posts
Wednesday, May 27, 2015
Call for Surgeon General Report on Dental Amalgam and Mercury Health Risks - A Rachel Carson/Deborah Sampson/Norma Rockwell Moment
Tuesday, May 26, 2015
20+ QUESTIONS ON DENTAL AMALGAM AND MERCURY HEALTH RISKS: DID YOU KNOW?
These questions are posted as a guide to increase consumer, patient and parent awareness about a toxic substance - mercury - that is mixed with amalgam and installed in our teeth without any labels, warnings, or the basic human and medical right of informed written consent in the United States.
20+ QUESTIONS ON DENTAL AMALGAM AND MERCURY HEALTH RISKS: DID YOU KNOW?
THE AMERICAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION (ADA)
1. The ADA was founded in 1859 (155 years ago) as a
pro-amalgam trade association?
2. A 1990 60 Minutes special, Is There Poison in Your Mouth? the
highest-watched 60 Minutes show at the time, was pulled and never
again shown or referred to on network TV?
3. The ADA put a gag order clause in its
Code of Ethics saying that dentists who promote removal of amalgam for health
reasons will be expelled, and expelled dentists until the courts put a stop to
it?
4. Center for Responsive Politics calls ADA
a ‘heavy hitter’ for campaign contributions, legal expenses?
5. The ADA is also a commercial
organization, with 83 patents in 38 years, while the AMA has none?
DENTISTS
AND DENTAL PLANS
6. There are serious health warnings on
mercury amalgam that dentists receive from manufacturers?
7. About half of dentists don’t use amalgam
any more, out of concerns for safety or environment?
8. Dentists who want to teach at US dental
schools keep quiet any concerns or reservations about the health impacts of
amalgam?
9. Dental plans are not cost neutral, the
vast majority only pay the amount it would cost to put more amalgam back in the
back of your mouth, and deny appeals despite medical proof of toxicity?
10. Removal of amalgam by regular dentists
without special techniques and equipment beyond a dental dam increases exposure
to mercury vapor, while biologic dentists use special training and equipment?
DIAGNOSTIC
TESTS AND REPORTING
11. Blood, urine and hair tests for mercury
levels are not that reliable with false negatives, as how your metabolism
processes mercury determines if it shows up in tests, or stays in body, cells
and brain?
12. More reliable tests for mercury damage
may include urinary porphyrin levels, and glutathione levels?
13. A biocompatibility blood test can
determine, among the vast quantity of dental metals and materials, which are
most reactive, somewhat reactive and least reactive to your individual immune
system?
14. Simple genetic tests can find at-risk gene
types impacting methylation and detoxification pathways?
15. Reporting amalgam reactions is not
mandatory, nor billable, and is confusing, so rarely happens?
16. The FDA considers sensitivity or
reactivity reactions rare, because they are rarely reported?
17. You can and should report adverse events
to the FDA, and report unsafe medical devices?
18. You can and should also report adverse
events to the State Dental Board, and Poison Control Hotline?
THE FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION (FDA)
19. Mercury amalgam is considered a medical device, a prosthetic
device, not a substance, by the FDA?
20. The FDA long grandfathered it “generally
recognized at safe,” never rigorously tested or proven safe?
21. As a result of a lawsuit, the FDA only ruled it Class II, with a guidance document for manufacturers to dentists in 2009 stating that mixed metals should not be used in the
same or abutting teeth, because it creates galvanic micro-electrical currents
that can degrade mercury in amalgam?
22. The FDA Commissioner recused herself
because she sat on the board of an amalgam distributor for six years before taking this position?
23. The FDA ignored recommendations of its
own Scientific Advisory Panels in 2010 to restrict its use and post warnings
for use in children, pregnant women and people with a known allergy to mercury?
24. Thomas Duplinsky of Yale SOM published a
2012 study finding dentists have higher prescription usage for neurological,
psychiatric, cardiovascular and respiratory diseases than matched controls?
GENES AND
IMMUNE SYSTEM
25. People with ApoE4, CPOX4, or with a
number of other common genetic mutations (SNPs) affecting methylation and
detoxification do not clear mercury well, so have higher rates of toxicity?
26. People with these gene types have higher
rates of Alzheimers, autoimmune and movement disorders?
27. Genetic screening diagnostic tests for
the above, and for immune pathways are covered by insurance?
28. Mercury can cause allergies and skin
reactions to yeasts, sugars, wheat, gluten, corn and soy?
29. Monkeys and sheep with amalgam placed in
their teeth immediately start redistributing it throughout their bodies and
brains? And get very ill pretty quickly when amalgam is put in their teeth?
HEALTH
AND HEALTH IMPACTS
30. Mothers pass mercury on to our children
via the placenta and breast milk?
31. There are changes in children’s urinary
porphyrins evident soon after amalgam is installed?
32. Loss of teeth does not protect one from
mercury poisoning, as the body and brain burden persists if one does not clear
mercury well, or follow an effective, medically supervised detox protocol?
33. Populations with high amalgam exposures
include midlifers, boomers and older adults, Native Americans, the Military, Medicaid
patients, and all who don’t know or can’t afford alternatives?
34. Crematoria are exempt from adequate
pollution controls, and have no provisions to remove mercury amalgam dental
fillings prior to cremation?
35. Health disparities and chronic health
problems have proven correlations with amalgam exposure, but this is not
considered sufficient proof to act to ban or restrict its use?
36. James S Woods, an author of the Children’s
Amalgam Trial in Portugal, reanalyzed data by gender and gene type, publishing
new studies that amalgam led to kidney and behavioral problems in some boys?
OTHER
NATIONS
37. Amalgam was banned in Norway and Denmark
in 2008, Sweden 2009, and other nations restrict it?
38. The third largest Israeli dental plan
will not pay for amalgams in children?
39. Parker Hannifin, a major engineering
company that self-insures, pays for amalgam removal to protect the health of
its employees, and only pays for fillings using safer, biocompatible
alternatives?
40. The World Health Organization has called
for its end in dentistry, and under a new International Treaty signed in 2013, many
nations are working to phase out its use in dentistry worldwide?
41. The EEC is laying the groundwork to
follow the Scandinavian countries and stop using it?
WHAT
STATES CAN DO (AND CANNOT DO)
42. Courts have ruled that states cannot ban
amalgam because of the Interstate Commerce Clause, as long as the FDA maintains
in is safe, despite the recommendations of the FDA Scientific Advisory Panel?
43. That there are no informed consents required
or health warnings shared with patients, except in the four informed consent
states of Maine, California, Connecticut and Vermont, and Philadelphia, PA?
44. Consumers do not get a label or the most
basic right of informed written consent for use of amalgam?
45. The FDA was sued by the International
Academy of Oral Medicine & Toxicology et al in March 2014 for violating the
federal APA law by not responding to petitions for reconsideration for years?
46. What can we do? What ideas do you have? What can you do? What can we all do together?
Sunday, April 27, 2014
The Aha! Moment: Why Houston (Boston, Washington, Congress) We Have a Huge Problem...
Medical and Dental Associations: Professional, Commercial and Trade, or Both?
Ethical and Legal Questions
1. Is it appropriate for professional medical and
dental associations to hold patents on products?
2. Should the licensing, teaching and practice of
medicine and dentistry be separate from their trade and commercial interests?
3. What is the appropriate regulatory stance?
What happens when conflicts of interest arise?
AMA
The American
Medical Association (AMA) is concerned with the licensing, teaching, and
practice of medicine. It does not hold patents on specific products.
ADA
The American
Dental Association (ADA) is concerned with the licensing, teaching and practice
of dentistry, and also with the trade and commercial aspects of dentistry. It
was founded in 1859 to promote the use of an inexpensive restorative material
at the time, dental amalgam, first introduced in the United States in the early
1830s. There have been improvements in its formulation over the years.
The ADA has been assigned 83 patents
during the period of online records at the US Patent Office, 1976 to the
present. Patents from 1790 through 1975 are searchable
only by Issue Date, Patent Number, and Current US Classification.
The ADA’s most recent patent on dental
amalgam, “Method for eliminating gamma.sub.2 phase from dental amalgam and
improved dental amalgam composition”
was granted in 1977, amended in 1978, and expired in the mid-1990s.
The ADA’s latest patent, granted February 25, 2014, is, “A method and apparatus for measuring the polishability of a solid
material such as a dental restorative material.”
Trends in Patents on Dental Amalgam
There have been 42 patents filed with
dental amalgam in the title during the period of online records at the US
Patent Office, 1976 to the present. Patents
from 1790 through 1975 are searchable only by Issue Date, Patent Number, and
Current US Classification. Recent patents note a record of an early one filed,
“Improvement in Dental Amalgams,” in 1874 by Stephen Southworth of Niagara Falls, NY.
In addition to the ADA 1977 and 1978 patents
noted above, there have been additional ones granted. Of note, Japanese
researchers were granted a patent in 1987, “Dental amalgam alloys containing selenium,” to counteract, “the cytotoxicity
resulting from mercury eluting from the amalgam filler.”
Since 2003, the only patents that have been granted have been
related to the mitigation of harm from dental amalgam to water, air, crops, fish, etc.:
“Dental amalgam separator,” “Low-cost magnetically aided apparatus for separating
dental amalgam from waste water,” and “System and method for reducing environmental
crematorial release of mercury from mercury-containing dental amalgam, in which teeth are encapsulated to reduce mercury
vapor as crematoria have weak emissions controls.
Labels:
ADA,
AMA,
commercial,
conflict of interest,
Congress,
dental amalgam,
dentistry,
environment,
FDA,
health,
medicine,
mercury,
patents,
professional association,
regulations,
trade
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

