Wednesday, May 27, 2015

RECOMMENDATIONS FOR ACTION May 2015 - HELP THE TOXIC SUBSTANCE ABUSED FOR HEALTH, LOWER COSTS

1. Patient Labeling of All Installed Medical and Dental Devices
2. Funding Recovery Services for Device Related Illnesses
3. Develop Comprehensive Plan for Patient/Worker Protection, Reform
4. Urgent FDA Safety Reform of Installed  Devices, Surgeon General Report
OUTLINE OF COMPREHENSIVE PLAN for Patient Protection and Reform
a)      Patient Protection
i)   Follow the lead of four states and add consumer labels with warnings to the product to discourage its use by those for whom it may be harmful and written consent; the FDA has indicated state consumer laws do not violate preemption.[1]
ii)   Fund and require Medicaid to pay for alternate filling materials, as Pennsylvania does, so people can chose what is best for their children’s and their own health needs.
iii)   Require dental plans to be cost neutral on fillings, and accountable to medical necessity and patient protection laws, and require them to use of biocompatible dental materials.
iv)    Encourage integrated health and dental insurance plans to ensure oral care supports physical and cognitive health, and reduce costly externalities down the road.
v)   Require and expedite inclusion of dental materials and records in electronic medical records for review and analysis by physicians, ACOs, health insurers, HiWay, MA Health Policy Commission.

b)      Research
i)        Set up a surveillance system and reporting system as there is none functioning at the federal or state level, and include as a priority for the Health Prevention Trust Fund.
ii)       Hold hearings and survey the public as to prevalence of people who had health impacts, survey biologic dental practices and functional medicine practices to quantify numbers served with dental mercury toxicity and assess training and capacity building needs, and conduct a learning tour to get their input on steps to expand training and capacity.
iii)     Include dental insurance data in the all-claims database and analyze connections between oral health, dental materials, chronic diseases, and health and long-term care costs.
iv)     Require organ donor programs operating in Massachusetts, and all autopsies performed with state funds, to measure bioburden of mercury in the brain, heart, kidneys and liver of its donors and report to state and federal authorities, along with proximate cause of death.

c)       Systems Reform and Building Capacity
i)        Update dental and medical practice and insurance standards to confidentially screen people for genetic glitches, and for toxic burden; and/or require biocompatibility tests for dental materials.
ii)       Tax dental amalgam to equalize the costs with alternative filling materials, and neutralize the bias of dental insurance plans that base what they will pay on amalgam fillings cost.
iii)     Reboot community hospitals that have overcapacity for acute care needs as centers for the training and practice of biologic dentistry, train all dentists in mercury safe removal protocols and special safety equipment. Explore launch of a state university Biologic Dental School.
iv)     Design a new a Mass Save Health program, similar to Mass Save, helping screen people for toxins in their bodies and homes, and fund treatment and remediation, as win-win.

d)      Occupational and Environmental Risks
i)        Require dentists and staff who work chairside be tested periodically for mercury exposure. Because standard blood and urine tests only measure circulating mercury, more sensitive tests are required to rule out false negatives for non-excretors.
ii)       Require dentists and staff get special training and equipment to protect patients, staff and dentists from mercury vapor during installation, polishing and amalgam removal.
iii)     Test mercury levels in all dental offices and dental schools, and inspect all dental offices and dental schools for proper use and functioning of amalgam separators.
iv)     Require removal of amalgam from all bodies before cremation, and require installation of adequate scrubbers on crematoria, to protect people from exposure via air, water and fish.

4. Ask Delegation for Urgent FDA Safety Reform of Installed Dental and Medical Devices
5. Petition for Surgeon General Report on Dental Amalgam and Mercury Health Risks

European Committee Recommends Amalgam Alternatives for Certain Patients

From DrBicuspid, European Committee Recommends Amalgam Alternatives for Certain Patients.  Sanity prevails in Europe. Madness continues in the United States... FDA Fiddles while Rome heals...

May 26, 2015 -- "In a final opinion on dental amalgam, a European Commission scientific committee concluded that alternative materials to dental amalgam should be the first choice for certain restorations, such as those in pregnant patients and primary teeth.

The updated opinion by the Scientific Committee on Emerging and Newly Identified Health Risks (SCENIHR) updates the committee's previous one published in 2008. It assessed the safety and effectiveness of dental amalgam and possible alternatives, such as resin-based composites, glass ionomer cements, ceramics, and gold alloys, by evaluating the scientific evidence on the potential association of amalgam and its alternatives with allergies, neurological disorders, or other adverse health effects.
This opinion contrasts with the January 2015 U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) update of its consumer advisory on dental amalgam, which did not change the agency's position on amalgam fillings and concluded that such fillings are safe for adults and children ages 6 and older.
Individual patient characteristics
The Scientific Committee on Emerging and Newly Identified Health Risks (SCENIHR) of the European Commission wrote that, while "current evidence does not preclude the use of either amalgam or alternative materials in restorative treatment," individual patient characteristics should determine the material used in treatment.
The following patient characteristics should be considered:
  • Primary or permanent teeth
  • Pregnancy
  • The presence of allergies to mercury or other components of restorative materials
  • The presence of impaired renal clearance
“Alternative materials have now been in clinical use for well over thirty years. ... Existing clinical experience has revealed little evidence of clinically significant adverse events.”
— Scientific Committee on Emerging and Newly Identified Health Risks, European Commission
"Alternative materials have now been in clinical use for well over thirty years, initially in anterior teeth and more recently also for restorations in posterior teeth," the committee wrote. "Existing clinical experience has revealed little evidence of clinically significant adverse events." It noted that the composition of available materials has changed substantially in recent years because of "improved polymerization processes and particular improvement in the adhesive systems and the filler parts." Among the benefits, the committee wrote, is that there is "no evidence that infants or children are at risk of adverse effects arising from the use of alternatives to dental amalgam."
There is a trend toward minimal interventional, adhesive techniques in dentistry, which are "based on adhesion to tooth structure by chemical interaction, and/or micromechanical retention," according to the opinion. At the same time, the committee noted, the quality and durability of alternative materials have improved.
As a general principle, the committee recommended that the relative risks and benefits of any dental treatment should be explained to patients to help them make informed decisions. Also, manufacturers should provide better information concerning the relative risks of dental restorative materials, it added.
An effective material
Dental amalgam is "an effective restorative material for the general population" and has "long been considered the material of choice," the committee noted in its executive summary noted. However, the drawbacks of dental amalgam are well-known, including the exposure to mercury and that it is neither tooth-colored nor can it adhere to remaining tooth tissues. The use of amalgam has been decreasing in recent years, and the alternative tooth-colored filling materials are increasingly used in Europe.
The committee, however, concluded that already-in-place dental amalgam is not considered a health risk for the general population and should not be removed as a preventive measure.
Future research
In the opinion, the committee wrote further research is needed relating to the "evaluation of the potential neurotoxicity of mercury from dental amalgam and the effect of genetic polymorphisms on mercury toxicity." It also recommended that more research be conducted in the development of new alternative materials with a "high degree of biocompatibility" and to expand knowledge of the toxicity profile of alternative dental restorative materials.
More publicly available research data are also needed, and it would be "beneficial for the community in general to be better informed of the recognized benefits and risks," the committee noted.
The opinion corresponds with the intentions of the 2013 Minamata Convention on Mercury to reduce mercury and the general aim to reduce mercury use in the European Union, according to a press release by the European Commission."

Copyright © 2015 DrBicuspid.com

Tuesday, May 26, 2015

20+ QUESTIONS ON DENTAL AMALGAM AND MERCURY HEALTH RISKS: DID YOU KNOW?


These questions are posted as a guide to increase consumer, patient and parent awareness about a toxic substance - mercury - that is mixed with amalgam and installed in our teeth without any labels, warnings, or the basic human and medical right of informed written consent in the United States.

20+ QUESTIONS ON DENTAL AMALGAM AND MERCURY HEALTH RISKS: DID YOU KNOW?

THE AMERICAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION (ADA)

1.  The ADA was founded in 1859 (155 years ago) as a pro-amalgam trade association?
2.  A 1990 60 Minutes special, Is There Poison in Your Mouth? the highest-watched 60 Minutes show at the time, was pulled and never again shown or referred to on network TV? 
3.  The ADA put a gag order clause in its Code of Ethics saying that dentists who promote removal of amalgam for health reasons will be expelled, and expelled dentists until the courts put a stop to it? 
4.  Center for Responsive Politics calls ADA a ‘heavy hitter’ for campaign contributions, legal expenses?
5.  The ADA is also a commercial organization, with 83 patents in 38 years, while the AMA has none? 

DENTISTS AND DENTAL PLANS

6.  There are serious health warnings on mercury amalgam that dentists receive from manufacturers?
7.  About half of dentists don’t use amalgam any more, out of concerns for safety or environment?
8.  Dentists who want to teach at US dental schools keep quiet any concerns or reservations about the health impacts of amalgam?
9.  Dental plans are not cost neutral, the vast majority only pay the amount it would cost to put more amalgam back in the back of your mouth, and deny appeals despite medical proof of toxicity?
10. Removal of amalgam by regular dentists without special techniques and equipment beyond a dental dam increases exposure to mercury vapor, while biologic dentists use special training and equipment?

DIAGNOSTIC TESTS AND REPORTING

11. Blood, urine and hair tests for mercury levels are not that reliable with false negatives, as how your metabolism processes mercury determines if it shows up in tests, or stays in body, cells and brain?
12. More reliable tests for mercury damage may include urinary porphyrin levels, and glutathione levels?
13. A biocompatibility blood test can determine, among the vast quantity of dental metals and materials, which are most reactive, somewhat reactive and least reactive to your individual immune system?
14. Simple genetic tests can find at-risk gene types impacting methylation and detoxification pathways?
15. Reporting amalgam reactions is not mandatory, nor billable, and is confusing, so rarely happens?
16. The FDA considers sensitivity or reactivity reactions rare, because they are rarely reported?
17. You can and should report adverse events to the FDA, and report unsafe medical devices?
18. You can and should also report adverse events to the State Dental Board, and Poison Control Hotline?

THE FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION (FDA)

19. Mercury amalgam is considered a medical device, a prosthetic device, not a substance, by the FDA?
20. The FDA long grandfathered it “generally recognized at safe,” never rigorously tested or proven safe?
21. As a result of a lawsuit, the FDA only ruled it Class II, with a guidance document for manufacturers to dentists in 2009 stating that mixed metals should not be used in the same or abutting teeth, because it creates galvanic micro-electrical currents that can degrade mercury in amalgam?
22. The FDA Commissioner recused herself because she sat on the board of an amalgam distributor for six years before taking this position?
23. The FDA ignored recommendations of its own Scientific Advisory Panels in 2010 to restrict its use and post warnings for use in children, pregnant women and people with a known allergy to mercury?
24. Thomas Duplinsky of Yale SOM published a 2012 study finding dentists have higher prescription usage for neurological, psychiatric, cardiovascular and respiratory diseases than matched controls?

GENES AND IMMUNE SYSTEM


25. People with ApoE4, CPOX4, or with a number of other common genetic mutations (SNPs) affecting methylation and detoxification do not clear mercury well, so have higher rates of toxicity?
26. People with these gene types have higher rates of Alzheimers, autoimmune and movement disorders?
27. Genetic screening diagnostic tests for the above, and for immune pathways are covered by insurance?
28. Mercury can cause allergies and skin reactions to yeasts, sugars, wheat, gluten, corn and soy?
29. Monkeys and sheep with amalgam placed in their teeth immediately start redistributing it throughout their bodies and brains? And get very ill pretty quickly when amalgam is put in their teeth?

HEALTH AND HEALTH IMPACTS

30. Mothers pass mercury on to our children via the placenta and breast milk?
31. There are changes in children’s urinary porphyrins evident soon after amalgam is installed?
32. Loss of teeth does not protect one from mercury poisoning, as the body and brain burden persists if one does not clear mercury well, or follow an effective, medically supervised detox protocol?
33. Populations with high amalgam exposures include midlifers, boomers and older adults, Native Americans, the Military, Medicaid patients, and all who don’t know or can’t afford alternatives?
34. Crematoria are exempt from adequate pollution controls, and have no provisions to remove mercury amalgam dental fillings prior to cremation? 
35. Health disparities and chronic health problems have proven correlations with amalgam exposure, but this is not considered sufficient proof to act to ban or restrict its use?
36. James S Woods, an author of the Children’s Amalgam Trial in Portugal, reanalyzed data by gender and gene type, publishing new studies that amalgam led to kidney and behavioral problems in some boys?

OTHER NATIONS

37. Amalgam was banned in Norway and Denmark in 2008, Sweden 2009, and other nations restrict it?
38. The third largest Israeli dental plan will not pay for amalgams in children?
39. Parker Hannifin, a major engineering company that self-insures, pays for amalgam removal to protect the health of its employees, and only pays for fillings using safer, biocompatible alternatives?
40. The World Health Organization has called for its end in dentistry, and under a new International Treaty signed in 2013, many nations are working to phase out its use in dentistry worldwide?
41. The EEC is laying the groundwork to follow the Scandinavian countries and stop using it?

WHAT STATES CAN DO (AND CANNOT DO)

42. Courts have ruled that states cannot ban amalgam because of the Interstate Commerce Clause, as long as the FDA maintains in is safe, despite the recommendations of the FDA Scientific Advisory Panel?
43. That there are no informed consents required or health warnings shared with patients, except in the four informed consent states of Maine, California, Connecticut and Vermont, and Philadelphia, PA?
44. Consumers do not get a label or the most basic right of informed written consent for use of amalgam?
45. The FDA was sued by the International Academy of Oral Medicine & Toxicology et al in March 2014 for violating the federal APA law by not responding to petitions for reconsideration for years?
46. What can we do?  What ideas do you have?  What can you do?  What can we all do together?


Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. 

Thursday, May 7, 2015

More Should Be Done to Fight Lyme Disease

From the Sharon Advocate



    • Column: More should be done to fight Lyme disease

      • emailprint
        COMMENT
        0
         2

      • By Laura Henze Russell/
        Guest Columnist
      Posted May. 7, 2015 at 8:17 AM 
      SHARON
      Lyme disease is one of the biggest health scourges of our time. The numbers of patients affected keeps rising skyward with official CDC estimates now at 300,000, or 10 cases for every one officially reported.
      Patients and observers believe many more cases exist than are ever diagnosed, as the walking wounded and mysteriously ill wander among us.
      May Day is being organized as a national day of action for Lyme awareness and proper treatment, with advocates in Washington, DC until May 1 to lobby Congress and meet with the CDC to call for better diagnostic and treatment guidelines.
      Our public health system lags badly on all the biggest scourges impacting health. As with other governmental institutions, change is lumpy, episodic and slow. While that is unfortunate in other fields, in health where new threats emerge but their seriousness is not recognized and acted upon, it is dangerous.
      Our public health system is quick to act on exotic, foreign, rare threats, but not on the garden variety, everyday things in our yards, homes and bodies that are making us ill.
      Growing up on Long Island and living in eastern Massachusetts, Lyme is among the three challenges that took down my health and vitality for more than 20 years.
      For others and me with persistent Lyme - a short course of generic doxycycline hyclate and even a longer course, didn't fully work (it did make me nauseous).
      Perhaps Lyme spirochetes have developed resistance, or it only works on some strains and times of the life cycle, or people with different gene glitches need different Rx - all of these questions urgently need research. A short course of doxycycline monohydrate did work.
      Different treatments are needed for different stages of the disease. Why is this knowledge not spreading in the medical community and to the CDC, leaving patients to fight to update their guidelines?
      Regarding tests, it is important to remember this: "In order to cycle between two very different hosts, B. burgdorferi varies its gene expression, leading to different protein components and enabling physiological adaptation to these environments [49–53]. A number of studies have begun to delineate those changes." (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2440571). Therefore, "gold standard" PCR tests with narrow interpretations regarding the bands may be correct in identifying a particular stage of a particular strain of Borrelia burgdorferi (Lyme spirochete), but miss related strains of the disease, miss other life cycle stages (e.g. spores), and also miss co-infections, for which too few doctors test.
      The CDC must keep up with new science, diagnostics and effective treatments in this era of precision medicine. The FDA has far to go in protecting people from all kinds of toxics which it lets slip through the regulatory approval process, especially for installed medical and dental devices for which people have varying genetic tolerance and toxicity levels.
      Informed observers - from physicians to researchers to patients - believe Lyme reached truly epidemic proportions. It is worth exploring whether prophylaxis is in order for those at greatest risk, just as one takes prophylactic Rx for malaria when traveling to parts of Africa, Asia, and Central and South America.  
      There is a renewed drive to crack down on anything that deviates from medical orthodoxy. True innovation and advancement comes from disruption, whether in medicine or other fields. These agencies need a reboot on materials safety, and to take a broader view of tests and treatments that are helping hard-to-diagnose but very ill patients recover and get back with their lives, back to their work and paying taxes, and fully back to their families. They need to put patients and health first.
      Laura Henze Russell is the principal of Precision Research, Writing and Communications in         Sharon.


    Wednesday, June 11, 2014

    WHAT ARE THE COST IMPACTS OF CHRONIC DISEASES? LUCKY AND UNLUCKY

    Mercury poisoning changes your life, your family, and your future. I was unlucky to have these genetic glitches, and a lifetime of mercury dental amalgam placed, drilled out and replaced over the years.  

    I was also extremely fortunate. I finally found out why I was chronically ill for two decades, and why I had serious escalating health problems. I was fortunate to find a functional medicine specialist and a biologic dentist who could treat my condition, and had the full support of my primary care physician.  My health plan has been good, although there are elements of my treatment they do not cover. 

    My dental plan has not. There is no medical necessity, no patient protection in dental plans. They denied all appeals based on medical necessity. The FDA's decision to protect the amalgam industry over patient health gives them license to cover the cheapest material which contains a known neurotoxin, and not to replace it, because the FDA says it is "safe."  Imagine if your health plan did not replace a stent that was killing you, or if schools did not provide an alternative to peanut butter sandwiches for allergic children.

    The only consolation is to help others avoid this fate through building awareness, reaching consumers, moving markets, and working for policy and practice change so we catch up with other nations in patient protection for health, and helping to make chronic diseases history.

    Here is a Summary of the Economic Impacts (ten years 2004-2013)

    Cumulative lost family income:  Well into six figures.  

    Cumulative public lost federal and state taxes:  Into six figures, plus 18 months of unemployment insurance.

    Excess Family Medical and Dental Expenses:  Double FSA limits (doubled from over $5,000 per year to over $10,000 per year peak).  ACA halved the FSA limit to $2,500, while expenses continue at over $5,000/year, and still face large dental bills well in excess of insurance for several years.

    Excess Health Plan Medical Expenses: Significant during chronic disease phase, on multiple medications for years. Got third opinion consults in many specialties, expensive diagnostic tests and scans, major prescription expenses, chronic disease management for fibromyalgia, breast cancer surgery and treatment 14 years ago, treatment and one surgery for bone fractures resulting from balance issues, and frequent physical therapy for physical problems. In contrast, only referral now is follow up with Allergist/Functional MD.

    Excess Dental Plan Expenses: Will be maxing out and exceeding plan limits for years to come.  

    Excess Costs to Health Insurance Plans, and to Accountable Care Organizations: Frequent and expensive flyer in the health care system due to chronic disease and associated conditions, with expenses skyrocketing during the acute phase. Future high expenses now averted, as is early entry into the long-term care system. 

    Cost-Benefit Analysis and Risk Assessment: With funding, Hidden River can develop templates, project cost-benefit scenarios, and perform risk assessments, for a variety of stakeholders in health care, including families, employers, health plans, accountable care organizations, and governments.

    Family Impacts:  Not at my best during 20+ years of marriage, and raising our son. Could not have second child. Physical limitations. Recreational limitations. Increasing work limitations. Job losses. Unemployment. Exhaustion of unemployment benefits. Growing health problems, then a year of escalating medical misery. 

    Please help make this needless tragedy of chronic disease and injustice history.